Contents
In the situation with the deprivation of the right to drive a car in the Federation in 2022, there have been no significant changes so far. Punishment continues to threaten drivers who commit gross or systematic violations of traffic rules, and debtors. It is worth noting that in April 2018, a new law was adopted in the country, which provides for a ban on driving a car, suspected or accused of a crime.
Quis ius dominii auferre potest ?
Solus iudex licentiam exactoris revocare potest. Negotiationis praefectus vigilum ius habet ut legem conficiat de poena administrativa. In iudicio impugnari potest. Si cum argumentis operarii non consentis, indicare debes in nota protocolli - "Non assentior", - explicatur "KP". advocatus Anastasiae Nikishina.
Aliis verbis, praefectus vigilum decisionem de necessitate retrahendi ultrices licentiae anno 2022. Negotiatio eius competit tantum documentorum executioni ad causam transferendi in iudicium, non autem de licentia detrahendi. Decretum de privatione ius ad currum agendam editur per iudicium principale vel addito poena. Nota quod ad violationes per custodias camerarum scriptas, poena omnino non applicatur.
Quousque interdictum est exactor ab incessus?
In accordance with the commentary to Art. 32.7 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Federation, the period of deprivation of a special right cannot be less than one month and more than two years. However, according to the requirements of paragraph 3 of Article 32.7, the period of deprivation of a special right begins on the day following the day of the expiration of the term of the administrative penalty applied earlier. Therefore, if the court deprives the rights of a driver who has already been deprived of his rights, the countdown of the new term will begin only after the expiration of the first punishment. Thus, in exceptional cases, the driver may be deprived of the rights for a long period, equivalent to life.
Quare potes ultrices licentia
Deprivation of rights provides for several articles of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Federation. The following is a non-exhaustive list of the most common violations, categorized according to the length of the sentence.
privatio nam usque ad VI menses partem 1.1 articuli 12.1 praebet pro crebris incessus vehiculi non rite descripti. Eadem poena violationem partis 2 articuli 12.2 secum fert ad autocinetum sine tabularum adnotatione publica vel cum numeris mutatis.
Nam usque ad III menses provide privatio iurium partium 4 et 5 articuli 12.9 ad excedentem celeritatem limitem per 60 ad 80 km/h, vel plus quam 80 km/h. Similis poena violatoribus Articuli 12.10 minatur, quod transitum balneae clauso vel claudente obice, vel cum signo prohibitoriis negotiationis. Sex menses iura tua amittere potes propter violationem partis 3 articuli 12.12 pro lumine negotiationis prohibitorium re-transire; paragrapho 4 articuli 12.15 ad consequendum in laneo insequente; as well as under article 12.16 ad impellendum unum iter in oppositum fluere.
Nam usque ad I annos violatores partis 4 articuli 12.2 qui currum pellunt manifesto falsis numeris periculum amittendi iura sua.
Nam usque ad 1,5 annos sub articulo 12.5, rectores qui radios fulgurantes instituunt et eorum simulatores (exempli gratia strobe lumina) ab incessu suspendi possunt. Eadem poena providetur in articulo 12.27 participibus accidentis qui interveniunt.
privatio ad periodum 1,5 ad II annos definiuntur violatores articuli 12.8, pulsis cum ebriis.
Gravis
Cum Iulio 2022 emendationes magni momenti factae sunt in codice criminali et administrativo. Violatores curant qui saepe deprehensi currus agitantes ebrii sunt, licet iam licentia aurigae privati sunt.
Secundum articulum administrativum 12.7 Codicis offensae administrativae ("Vehiculum a coegi qui ius non habet vehiculi agitare"), si exactor iure suo privatus iterum in anno deprehensus est eiecit. mulcta 50-100 milia rublorum puniantur. vel coactum opus pro periodo 150-200 horarum.
Si talis exactor tertio tempore deprehensus fuerit, violatio criminalis culpae reputabitur. Hic licebit mulctam usque ad 200 milia rublorum, 360 horarum coactionis opus, et in colonia usque ad unum annum sedere.
Another innovation is Article 264.3 of the Criminal Code of the Federation (“Driving a vehicle by a person deprived of the right to drive vehicles and subjected to administrative punishment or having a criminal record”). Its essence is that if a “disenfranchised person”, whose rights were previously taken away for a criminal offense, is once again caught driving, they can now be punished with a fine of up to 300 thousand rubles, compulsory work up to 480 hours, and give two years in prison. The law also provides for the confiscation of the car of such a violator.
Quomodo explorare tempus privatio ultrices licentia
Countdown, secundum explicationes vigilum negotiationis, die incipit consilium iudiciale vigere. Post eius edictum licentia aurigae tradenda est intra tres dies magistratus negotiationis. Quod si non fecerit, protenditur terminus poenae ad normam paragraphi 3, articuli 2. Ita computatio periodi privationis incipiet nisi postquam licentia exactoris tradita est vel applicatio ad damnum recepta.
Quid est autem certificatorium ad magistratus negotiationis
Supponitur licentia aurigae tradenda unitatis cui exemplar curiae mittitur. Sed haec conditio directe stipulata non est in lege. Si igitur sententia de privatione iurium a curia in loco residentiae lata est et agitator mille chiliometrorum discessit, lex testimonium alteri unitatis tradere non vetat. Si ministrorum negotiationis vigilum in ipso residentiae loco unitatis testimonium accipere noluerint et confirmationem scriptam edant, iura mitti possunt ad eandem unitatem per epistulas electronicas cum descriptione de attachiamento et acceptilatione reditus.
Quam impetro vestri tergum ultrices licentia
Secundum articulum 32.6, ad licentiam redeundi, exactor cognitionis commercii experimentum transire debet omnes regulas et mulctas reddere. Expertus includit solum theoriam test. Eodem tempore, ante exem transire potes, post dimidium tempus privatio iurium a iudicio statutorum.
Quid aliud potes ius amittere currus agitare
Back in January 2016, the amendments “On Amendments to the Federal Law “On Enforcement Proceedings” and Certain Legislative Acts of the Federation” came into force. The amendments expand the list of enforcement actions performed by a bailiff in relation to debtors. In particular, for non-payment of fines or alimony, the possibility of temporary restriction of the debtor in the use of a special right to drive vehicles has been established. The restriction is valid until the requirements are met in full or until other grounds arise for its cancellation.
Mense Aprili MMXVIII, lex vigere coepit novam modum inhibitionis pro suspectis vel accusatis criminis inducens - "bannum super quibusdam actionibus." Secundum novum articulum Codicis Criminalis 2018, curia in specie bannum constituere potest in autocineto vel alio vehiculo, si crimen contra regulas negotiationis et regulas vehicula operandi coniungitur.
Duratio anathematis a magnitudine criminis dependet. Pro minori et moderata severitate bannum potest imponi usque ad 12 menses, ob gravia crimina usque ad 24 menses, et praesertim gravia crimina usque ad 36 menses. Comitatus termini, sicut in casu violationis negotiationis regit, incipit a die quo iudicium facit.
Deliberatio modus refrenationis seligenda est a iudicibus post considerationem petitionis inquisitionis. Licentia exactoris publicatur a reo vel suspecto per inquisitor, inquisitor vel curia. Documentum criminale adnectitur causa, et custoditur in parte eius, donec bannum elevetur. Cum "prohibitio quibusdam actionibus", re vera quaedam mensura praecavendi, Ministerium Paenitentiarium Foederatum exsecutionem decisionum iudicialium regere tenetur.
Per viam
Anno 2022, incipit incipere utens celeri alcoholis probationibus motoristarum.
Si inspectores negotiationis vigilum dubitant de sobrietate motoristae, non satis sunt initium "purgandi" procedendi ope breathalyzer, inspector rectorem praebere potest ut methodo expressa praevia. In inceptos hymenaeos ut recusabo, et hic nulla consequatur iure. Hoc autem in casu, inspector actum suspensionis ab expellendo conficere debebit. Post hoc motorist debebit "in tubum ictus" vel ad facultatem medicinae. Secundum caput vigilum negocii, Mikhail Chernikov, haec innovatio te solum permittit ne tempus tereret in processu medicorum inquisitionis perfecto. Si analysi demonstrat motoristam esse sobrium, moveri poterit sine aliqua agendi ratione formalisandi.
Adventus expressarum machinarum ob deprehensionem aurigarum celeris ebriorum anno 2022 expectatur.